Full Article
Evidence Summary
What is an Evidence Summary?
Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide thisIn people with heart failure, implanted cardiac devices with both resynchronization and defibrillation save more lives than either alone
Woods B, Hawkins N, Mealing S, et al. Individual patient data network meta-analysis of mortality effects of implantable cardiac devices. Heart. 2015;101:1800-6.
Review question
In people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, are some cardiac devices implanted under the skin better than others for reducing risk of death?
Background
Heart failure occurs when your heart can’t pump blood well enough to meet the needs of your body. Ejection fraction is a measure of how well your heart is pumping blood (over 50% is normal).
Devices can be implanted below the skin and connected to the heart to help it pump better and more regularly. Such devices include cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and combined devices (CRT pacemakers with defibrillation).
How the review was done
The researchers did a systematic review, searching for studies that were published in English up to June 2011.
They included 22 randomized controlled trials with13,350 people (average age 64 years, 77% men).
The key features of the studies were:
- people had heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less;
- implantable cardiac devices were CRT pacemakers, ICDs, and combination devices (CRT pacemakers with defibrillation);
- most implantable cardiac devices were compared with medical therapy alone or with each other; and
- people were followed for an average of about 2.5 years.
- ss=MsoListParagraphCxSpLast style='margin-left:0cm'>Trials were combined using a type of analysis that lets you compare treatments even if they were not compared directly in the individual trials.
What the researchers found
- CRT pacemakers, ICDs, and combined devices each reduced deaths more than medical therapy alone; and
- combined devices were better than CRT pacemakers or ICDs for reducing deaths.
More work needs to be done to determine whether some people benefit more from some devices than others.
Conclusion
In people with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, implantable cardiac devices with both resynchronization and defibrillation save more lives than resynchronization pacemakers or implantable defibrillators.
Cardiac devices implanted under the skin for reducing deaths in people with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction*
| Treatment comparisons | Effect on deaths at an average of 2.5 years |
| Combined device† vs medical therapy | Combined devices reduced deaths by about 42%‡ |
| CRT pacemaker vs medical therapy | CRT pacemakers reduced deaths by about 28% |
| ICD vs medical therapy | ICDs reduced deaths by about 29% |
| Combined device† vs CRT pacemaker | Combined devices reduced deaths by about 19% |
| Combined device† vs ICD | Combined devices reduced deaths by about 18% |
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy; ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator
*Trials were combined using a type of analysis that lets you compare treatments even if they were not compared directly in the individual trials.
Related Topics
Glossary
Studies where people are assigned to one of the treatments purely by chance.
A comprehensive evaluation of the available research evidence on a particular topic.
Related Evidence Summaries
-
Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2017)
-
Pre-hospital versus in-hospital initiation of cooling for survival and neuroprotection after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2016)
-
Psychological interventions for depression and anxiety in patients with coronary heart disease, heart failure or atrial fibrillation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2024)
