+AA
Fr
McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Evidence Summary

What is an Evidence Summary?

Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on

Got It, Hide this
  • Rating:

Patient-centred approaches may be beneficial in the provision of care for chronic heart failure patients

Kane PM, Murtagh FE, Ryan K, et al.  The gap between policy and practice: A systematic review of patient-centred care interventions in chronic heart failure Heart Failure Reviews. 2015 October:20(6):673-687.

Review question

Can patient-centred care be used to inform treatment decisions for chronic heart failure patients in order to improve care?

Background

Patients with chronic heart failure experience considerable illness burden, reduced quality of life and high levels of uncertainty with respect to their future health status.

Treatment decisions for chronic heart failure are challenging for both patients and healthcare providers due to an increase in the number of available treatment options, patients’ lack of understanding of their likely health outcomes, and challenges understanding the detrimental effects the treatment can have on quality of life.

Patient-centred care may be a promising means to encourage patient involvement and incorporate their preferences, values, beliefs, illness understanding and experience into the decision-making process; however, there has been no systematic effort examining the evidence.

How the review was done

A detailed search of a number of electronic databases for studies published up to March 2015 was conducted. Studies that focused on patient empowerment, self-care and shared decision-making were included.

A total of 13,944 studies were identified in searches, and 15 studies were included in the review after assessments for eligibility.

This review was funded by BuildCARE, the National Institute for Health Research, and the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Funding. 

What the researchers found

The approaches to patient-centred care identified in the studies included patient assessment, education of healthcare professionals and patients, and healthcare professional-patient collaboration.

The review found low- and moderate-quality evidence that patient-centred care improves health-related quality of life, symptom burden, depression and patient engagement.

There is a gap between policy recommendations for patient-centred care and actual clinical practice given there is no agreed-upon definition of patient-centred care, and typical indicators used for measuring the quality of care in chronic heart failure (i.e. discharge instructions, medication use and smoking cessation) do not encompass components relevant to patient-centred care.

Conclusion

Patient-centred care may be beneficial in treating patients with chronic heart failure, but high-quality evidence is needed to establish a strong relationship between specific aspects of patient-centred care and better care outcomes.




Related Web Resources

  • Breast cancer: Risks and benefits, age 50-69

    Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
    Your risk of dying from breast cancer is slightly reduced if you have regular screening. However, regular screening increases your chance of a false positive result, a biopsy and having part or all of a breast removed unnecessarily.
  • Breast cancer: Patient algorithm

    Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
    The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommends women between 50 and 74 years old who are not at high risk get screened for breast cancer every 2 to 3 years. Talk to your doctor about screening options if you are at high risk or over 74 years old.
  • Breast cancer: Patient FAQ

    Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
    This resource includes frequently asked questions about breast cancer, including: Who is considered high risk? What are the harms associated with mammography? and Why is routine screening NOT recommended for women 40-49 years?
DISCLAIMER These summaries are provided for informational purposes only. They are not a substitute for advice from your own health care professional. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal (info@mcmasteroptimalaging.org).

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register
Want the latest in aging research? Sign up for our email alerts.
Subscribe

Support for the Portal is largely provided by the Labarge Optimal Aging Initiative. AGE-WELL is a contributing partner. Help us to continue to provide direct and easy access to evidence-based information on health and social conditions to help you stay healthy, active and engaged as you grow older. Donate Today.

© 2012 - 2020 McMaster University | 1280 Main Street West | Hamilton, Ontario L8S4L8 | +1 905-525-9140 | Terms Of Use