Full Article
Evidence Summary
What is an Evidence Summary?
Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide thisLow-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening reduces lung cancer deaths and total deaths in current and former smokers with no symptoms
Humphrey LL, Deffebach M, Pappas M, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:411-20.
Review question
What is the current evidence on screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (CT)?
Background
CT uses computer-processed X-rays to create pictures (tomographic images) of selected areas of the body.
As early-stage lung cancer is associated with lower mortality than late-stage disease, early detection and treatment are beneficial.
How the review was done
This review updates the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force’s evidence on the effectiveness and harms of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer.
The researchers did a systematic review of 4 randomized controlled trials comparing low-dose CT screening for lung cancer with chest x-ray or usual care without low-dose CT.
Trials were the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), Detection and Screening of Early Lung Cancer (DANTE), Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST), and Multicentric Italian Lung Detection (MILD).
Studies included current or former smokers, aged 49 to 74, with no symptoms. Follow-up was between 2.8 and 6.5 years for at least 50%of participants. Publication period was 2008 to 2012.
What the researchers found
The large NLST study included 53,454 people. After 6.5 years of follow-up, lung cancer deaths were reduced by 20% in the low-dose CT group compared with the control group (chest x-ray). Statistically, the mortality reduction in this trial could range between 7 and 27%.
The number of patients needed to screen to prevent 1 lung cancer death was 320 among participants who completed 1 screening.
Deaths from any cause were reduced by 6.7% (from 1.2 to 13.6%). The number needed to screen to prevent 1 death was 219.
The DANTE, DLCST, and MILD studies were much smaller (between 2,472 and 4,104 people). None showed benefit of low-dose CT compared with usual care (no low-dose CT).
Low-dose CT did not reduce overall quality of life or affect smoking rates.
Low-dose CT detected several incidental findings, such as emphysema and calcium build-up in the heart arteries.
Harms included radiation exposure, overdiagnosis (that is, a high rate of false-positive findings that were typically resolved with further imaging).
Conclusion
Low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer deaths and deaths from any cause in current and former smokers who do not show symptoms of the disease.
Glossary
A group that receives either no treatment or a standard treatment.
A test result that suggests the presence of a disease which turns out not to be there.
Studies where people are assigned to one of the treatments purely by chance.
A comprehensive evaluation of the available research evidence on a particular topic.
Related Evidence Summaries
-
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2018)
-
Educational interventions are effective in improving knowledge about cancer risk reduction among men
Patient Education and Counseling (2018)
-
Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2016)
