Full Article

McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Policymaker (health systems) article

Home-based supervised exercise versus hospital-based supervised exercise or unsupervised walk advice as treatment for intermittent claudication: A systematic review

Findings
  • Evidence Summary
    Evidence Summary
  • Supporting technical documents that are health systems-relevant
    Not usually available for this document type
  • Scientific Abstract
    PubMed
  • Scientific Abstract
    Publisher
Recency, quality and context of the findings
  • Last year literature searched
    2014
  • Year Published
    2015
  • Quality Rating
    8/10 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
  • Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conducted
    USA (6); Italy (1); Netherlands (1); UK (1)
  • Global/regional focus
    Not yet available
  • Country focus
    USA (6); Italy (1); Netherlands (1); UK (1)
  • Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus
s
Additional details about the research
  • Type of document
    Systematic review of effects
  • Type of question
    Effectiveness
  • Focus
    Specific
  • Target
    Individual
    Community
  • Priority Area
    Not applicable
  • Health system topic(s)
    Delivery arrangements
    Where care is provided
    Site of service delivery
  • Theme
    Optimal aging
  • Domain
    Diseases
    Non-communicable diseases
    Cardiovascular disease
    Sectors
    Home care
    Hospital care
    Providers
    Allied health professional
    Caregivers
Publication details
  • Citation
    Back M, Jivegard L, Johansson A, Nordanstig J, Svanberg T, Adania UW, et al. Home-based supervised exercise versus hospital-based supervised exercise or unsupervised walk advice as treatment for intermittent claudication: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;47(9):801-808.
  • DOI
    10.2340/16501977-2012

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register